Validate demand before you build
Pull real search-demand signal for your idea, its category, and a competitor — programmatically, no screenshots — and get a plain read on whether interest is growing or dying before you commit a week to building.
Library
Filter by role, type, difficulty, or category. Every entry is tagged with the Founding Four role that runs it, plus Foundations for the shared context every role reads.
No entries match those filters. Try clearing one.
Pull real search-demand signal for your idea, its category, and a competitor — programmatically, no screenshots — and get a plain read on whether interest is growing or dying before you commit a week to building.
Four gates and two human checks that turn 'should I build this' into a verdict (Keep, Bench, or Scrap) before you write a single role file.
Cursor is a full code editor with AI built in; Claude Code is conversation-and-diff-first with no editor to learn. The right pick depends on whether you want to live in an IDE or not.
Skip the benchmark comparisons — the useful test is running your own actual, recurring task on both and judging the output against what you know to be true.
No-code builders are for structured, persistent apps with a defined data model. Cowork is for conversational, judgment-heavy workflows. Most founders need both, for different jobs.
A framework for deciding whether to pay, since exact plans and prices change: usage volume, whether you need Cowork or Claude Code, and how much context you regularly need in one conversation.
Turns one good customer call into a real case-study draft — built from what they actually said, not invented quotes.
Three surfaces, one underlying model — the choice is about how much you want to review each step, not which one is smarter.
Before writing a JD, a plain framework for whether the role is actually a hiring problem or a workflow you haven't built yet.
Three roles that traditionally get hired early but that a founder running real workflows on Claude can often cover solo for longer than expected.
Drafts honest answers to the hard questions before you're put on the spot in a room, using your real numbers and your real weak spots.
Turns a plain spreadsheet of prospects into something that behaves like a CRM — stage tracking, follow-up flags, and a weekly summary — with no new tool to buy.
Hand Claude all your interview transcripts at once and make it count and rank requests — with the quotes cited so you can trust it.
Drafts the actual narrative arc of a seed deck from your real story — not slide-by-slide copy, the through-line that makes the slides make sense.
Not 'I'm busy' — the actual signal is a specific, recurring, judgment-heavy task that a workflow genuinely can't cover, showing up consistently for weeks.
Drafts a specific, honest first-90-days plan for a new hire, instead of a generic template that doesn't reflect what your company actually needs from them.
Turns a week of commit history into a real, user-readable changelog entry — without you writing it from memory after the fact.
A repeatable weekly rhythm for doing your own sales — research, outreach, and follow-up — without a sales background or a sales team.
A term sheet is a non-binding summary of a deal's key terms — the fastest way to understand one is to have Claude translate the actual document into plain language, clause by clause.
The context window is everything Claude can see at once for a given response — your prompt, your files, the conversation so far. Nothing outside it exists to the model.
An LLM predicts likely next words from patterns in its training — which explains both why it's useful and exactly where it'll quietly go wrong.
Training happens once, ahead of time, and you don't touch it. Inference is every single response Claude gives you — the part you actually interact with.
RAG means fetching the relevant piece of a large pile of documents before answering, instead of stuffing everything into context at once.
Synthesis is turning a pile of scattered user feedback into a ranked, countable signal — the step founders skip because it's tedious, not because it's hard.
Surfaces the request that keeps quietly recurring across support tickets, calls, and interviews — the one that's easy to dismiss individually but adds up.
The gap between a bad prompt and a good one is almost never cleverness — it's context, specificity, and telling Claude what you actually want back.
Turns raw exports from wherever your data actually lives into a real, readable metrics view — no analyst, no BI tool license required.
Scores a pile of résumés against a rubric you wrote once, so you spend your limited hiring time on the shortlist instead of the whole stack.
A data room is the folder of documents serious investors expect before they'll move — assembling it before it's asked for saves the exact week you don't have during a raise.
Claude Code has explicit permission modes, from asking before every edit to acting more autonomously — the right setting depends on what it's touching, not on how much you trust it in general.
Turns a vague, hard-to-reproduce bug into a real fix by having Claude Code investigate the actual codebase instead of guessing from a description.
The single most common way founders get a vague investor update: they describe their metrics in a sentence instead of pasting the real numbers in.
Drafts a full onboarding email sequence in your own voice, grounded in what new users actually need to succeed with your product.
A skill is a reusable instruction set you write once instead of re-explaining every time — the difference between a one-off prompt and a real tool.
Ships a real, working landing page by describing what you want and reviewing Claude Code's actual changes — no prior coding experience required.
A hook triggers an automatic action around something Claude Code does — mostly an engineering tool, worth knowing about even if you rarely reach for it directly.
A subagent is a specialist Claude Code can delegate a piece of work to — useful for heavier research or multi-part tasks, rarely needed for a founder's everyday work.
A connector lets Claude read and act on a real tool you already use — Gmail, your calendar, a CRM — instead of you copy-pasting between tabs.
ICP means the specific person who buys fast and stays — writing yours down is what makes every other outreach workflow actually work.
Adds real payment collection to your product with Claude Code — with the review discipline real money handling actually deserves.
Turns scattered planning docs and half-finished notes into a real, prioritized roadmap you can actually show someone.
A diff shows exactly what changed, line by line — red for removed, green for added. Learning to read one is the actual skill that makes Claude Code worth using over chat.
Ships a real, working waitlist page with email capture in one sitting — no page builder, no template fighting.
Cowork is for anything that needs to run more than once, or take several steps on its own — the middle ground between chat and Claude Code.
A short spec written before you build catches the vague parts of an idea while they're still cheap to fix — before you or Claude have written a line of code.
Six commands cover almost everything a founder needs to navigate a terminal well enough to use Claude Code's CLI — the rest you can skip.
Claude Code reads a folder on your machine and remembers it — the difference between a chat tab and something that actually edits your files.
A literal, minute-by-minute walkthrough of opening Claude Code for the first time and getting it to do something real.
A memory file tells Claude the things it would otherwise ask you every time — what you're building, who your users are, how you write.